1994 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2

To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Thunderbird.

Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Thunderbird.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Ford Thunderbird 2008 Land Rover LR2
Make Ford Land Rover
Model Thunderbird LR2
Year Released 1994 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 3201 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 291 Nm 317 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.8 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 96 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2180 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 70 L