1994 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1994 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | Pixo |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2360 mm |