1994 Ford Tracer vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tracer weights approximately 290 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tracer. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tracer | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Tracer | M250 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 176 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1120 mm |