1994 Ford Tracer vs. 2000 Rover 75
To start off, 2000 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rover 75 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tracer. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rover 75 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1994 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rover 75 (161 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tracer. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tracer | 2000 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Tracer | 75 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |