1994 Ford Versailles vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Versailles. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Versailles would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1994 Ford Versailles. (91 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Versailles.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Versailles. (144 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Versailles.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Versailles | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Versailles | Matrix |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2601 mm |