1994 Ford Windstar vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1994 Ford Windstar. (155 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Windstar weights approximately 62 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (522 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Windstar. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Windstar.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Windstar | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Windstar | Mustang |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 522 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1628 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1830 mm |