1994 Ford Windstar vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1994 Ford Windstar. (155 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Windstar weights approximately 565 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Windstar (220 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Windstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Windstar | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Windstar | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 216 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1780 mm |