1994 Holden Barina vs. 2006 Renault Clio

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1994 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Barina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 250 kg more than 1994 Holden Barina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Barina. (103 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Barina.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Holden Barina 2006 Renault Clio
Make Holden Renault
Model Barina Clio
Year Released 1994 2006
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1298 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 103 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 780 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 3820 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2690 mm