1994 Holden Nova vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1994 Holden Nova is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (137 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 385 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Holden | Mercury |
Model | Nova | Cougar |
Year Released | 1994 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 137 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |