1994 Holden Nova vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Holden Nova is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Holden Nova (114 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (155 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Nova | 626 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 155 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |