1994 Holden Nova vs. 2000 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2000 Lancia Zeta is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Zeta (145 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 635 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Zeta (235 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 2000 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Holden | Lancia |
Model | Nova | Zeta |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |