1994 Holden Nova vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Holden Nova (114 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Holden Nova (155 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (140 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1994 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Holden Nova | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Nova | 3 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1762 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |
