1994 Holden Nova vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Holden Nova (114 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Holden Nova weights approximately 155 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Holden Nova (155 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1994 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Holden | MCC |
Model | Nova | Smart |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 155 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |