1994 Holden Nova vs. 2005 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Smart Roadster is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart Roadster (100 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova.
Because 2005 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Smart Roadster (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 2005 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Holden | Smart |
Model | Nova | Roadster |
Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |