1994 Holden Nova vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Nova | UTE |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |