1994 Holden Nova vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (229 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (159 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.

Compare all specifications: