1994 Holden Nova vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Holden Nova | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | Nova | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 132 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2601 mm |
