1994 Holden Nova vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 81 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 160 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Nova | Clio |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2580 mm |