1994 Holden Nova vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (155 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1994 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1994 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Holden Nova | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Nova | 3 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1303 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |