1994 Italdesign Nazca vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Italdesign Nazca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Italdesign Nazca would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Italdesign Nazca (346 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Italdesign Nazca should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1994 Italdesign Nazca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Italdesign Nazca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Italdesign Nazca (470 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1994 Italdesign Nazca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Italdesign Nazca | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Italdesign | Ford |
Model | Nazca | E-350 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4988 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2619 mm |