1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1950 Morris Oxford
To start off, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 3,238 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 (216 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1950 Morris Oxford. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Morris Oxford.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 (302 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Morris Oxford. (88 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1994 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 1950 Morris Oxford | |
| Make | Jaguar | Morris |
| Model | XJ6 | Oxford |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3238 cc | 1476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 302 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 40 L |
