1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,238 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 (216 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 (302 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | XJ6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3238 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 302 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 64 L |