1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (216 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (302 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XJ6 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3238 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 302 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 100 L |