1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 263 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 (392 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XJ6 | 75 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 392 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1798 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 65 L |