1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2010 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2010 Ford Explorer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 (216 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Ford Explorer. (207 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Explorer.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Jaguar XJ6 (302 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Explorer. (254 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1994 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 2010 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XJ6 | Explorer |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3238 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 302 Nm | 254 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 4.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 85 L |