1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher.
Because 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (302 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. 1994 Jaguar XJ6 has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Jaguar XJ6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ6 | C30 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 302 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 60 L |