1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2013 BMW M6
To start off, 2013 BMW M6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M6 (552 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 336 more horse power than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (216 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW M6 (678 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (302 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 2013 BMW M6 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | XJ6 | M6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3238 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 552 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 302 Nm | 678 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0 :1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4903 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 2106 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2851 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 80 L |