1994 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2013 Volvo S80
To start off, 2013 Volvo S80 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,238 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S80 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (216 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Because 2013 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S80 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (302 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJ6 | 2013 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ6 | S80 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3238 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 302 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 93 mm |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1861 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1493 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2835 mm |