1994 Jaguar XJR vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1994 Jaguar XJR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 272 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1994 Jaguar XJR has manual transmission. 1994 Jaguar XJR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Jaguar XJR | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | XJR | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3980 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |
