1994 Jaguar XJS vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 795 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1994 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJS | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJS | Clio |
Year Released | 1994 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |