1994 Jaguar XJS vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (240 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1994 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1994 Jaguar XJS.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Jaguar XJS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1994 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1994 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jaguar XJS | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJS | XC90 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |