1994 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Jeep Cherokee (182 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Because 1994 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Smart Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Jeep Cherokee (301 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1994 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Jeep Cherokee | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Jeep | Smart |
Model | Cherokee | Roadster |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |