1994 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1994 Jeep Cherokee. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1994 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 247 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1994 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Jeep Cherokee | 2006 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Jeep | Acura |
| Model | Cherokee | CSX |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
