1994 Lada Natacha vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lada Natacha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lada Natacha would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1994 Lada Natacha. (70 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1994 Lada Natacha. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 360 kg more than 1994 Lada Natacha. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lada Natacha. (118 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lada Natacha. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1994 Lada Natacha has manual transmission. 1994 Lada Natacha will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Lada Natacha | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Natacha | CU-X |
Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1345 kg |