1994 Lancia Delta vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1994 Lancia Delta is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (115 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Delta. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 44 kg more than 1994 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Delta. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1975 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Lancia Delta | 1975 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Delta | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1994 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1581 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |