1994 Lancia Delta vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Delta. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 209 kg more than 1994 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Delta. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Lancia Delta | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Delta | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1581 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |