1994 Lancia Kappa vs. 1975 Mazda 929
To start off, 1994 Lancia Kappa is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 1994 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Kappa (124 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 325 kg more than 1975 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Kappa (250 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Lancia Kappa | 1975 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Kappa | 929 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |
