1994 Lancia Kappa vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Kappa. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Kappa.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Kappa. (186 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Kappa.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Lancia Kappa | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Lancia | Jaguar |
Model | Kappa | XF |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 600 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.8 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |