1994 Lancia Kappa vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 1994 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Kappa (124 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Kappa (250 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Lancia Kappa | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lancia | Renault |
| Model | Kappa | Clio |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.5 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
