1994 Lancia Kappa vs. 2012 Hyundai ix35

To start off, 2012 Hyundai ix35 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 1,998 cc (5 cylinders), 1994 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Kappa (145 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2012 Hyundai ix35. (133 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 2012 Hyundai ix35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 19 kg more than 2012 Hyundai ix35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Kappa (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Hyundai ix35. (164 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Hyundai ix35. 1994 Lancia Kappa has automatic transmission and 2012 Hyundai ix35 has manual transmission. 2012 Hyundai ix35 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Kappa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Lancia Kappa 2012 Hyundai ix35
Make Lancia Hyundai
Model Kappa ix35
Year Released 1994 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1591 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 145 HP 133 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 186 Nm 164 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4850 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 77 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.7 mm 85.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 11:01
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1446 kg 1427 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2640 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]