1994 Lancia Zeta vs. 1978 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 1994 Lancia Zeta is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.

Because 1978 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-7. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda RX-7 has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda RX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: