1994 Lancia Zeta vs. 2002 Proton Saloon
To start off, 2002 Proton Saloon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 1,929 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Zeta (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Proton Saloon. (82 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton Saloon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton Saloon. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton Saloon. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 2002 Proton Saloon has manual transmission. 2002 Proton Saloon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Lancia Zeta | 2002 Proton Saloon | |
| Make | Lancia | Proton |
| Model | Zeta | Saloon |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 109 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
