1994 Lancia Zeta vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.

Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.

Compare all specifications: