1994 Lancia Zeta vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jeep Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (453 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Lancia Zeta | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Lancia | Jeep |
Model | Zeta | Commander |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1929 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 453 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |