1994 Lancia Zeta vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Lancia Zeta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (440 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Lancia Zeta | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Lancia | Volvo |
| Model | Zeta | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
