1994 Lancia Zeta vs. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (327 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Chevrolet Silverado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (414 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Lancia Zeta | 2013 Chevrolet Silverado | |
| Make | Lancia | Chevrolet |
| Model | Zeta | Silverado |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1929 cc | 5998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 414 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
