1994 Land Rover Defender vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Land Rover Defender. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Land Rover Defender would be higher. At 2,501 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Land Rover Defender (182 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Land Rover Defender should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 1994 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Land Rover Defender (312 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 1994 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Land Rover Defender | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | Defender | Clio |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2690 mm |