1994 Land Rover Defender vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Land Rover Defender. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Land Rover Defender would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Tundra (236 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1994 Land Rover Defender. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1994 Land Rover Defender.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Land Rover Defender. (312 Nm). This means 2006 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Land Rover Defender.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Land Rover Defender | 2006 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Defender | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 236 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 361 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3270 mm |
