1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1994 Land Rover Range Rover. (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1994 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 609 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover (270 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 1994 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Range Rover | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
