1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Acura TL
To start off, 2011 Acura TL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1994 Land Rover Range Rover. (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1994 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 420 kg more than 2011 Acura TL.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover (381 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Acura TL. (370 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1994 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Acura TL | |
Make | Land Rover | Acura |
Model | Range Rover | TL |
Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 381 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2776 mm |